To the many people who have been identifying unknown lichens as genus Lichen: it has recently been brought to my attention that the genus Lichen has not been in use for some time and is synonymous with Parmelia (details), so I'm retiring it. In the future you should identify any unknown lichens as kingdom Fungi. I know that's not very specific, but lichens as a group do not conform to any one taxon: they do not all share a common ancestor because lichenization (probably) evolved numerous times. It's sort of like trying to identify a tall, woody plant as a "tree": linguistically accurate, but not taxonomically meaningful. Some day we might develop non-taxonomic categorization schemes for iNat, but until we do, identifying unknown lichens as Fungi is the way to go.
That being said, a quick search on Index Fungorum reveals numerous species in the genus Lichen that are considered synonyms of species outside of genus Parmelia, so in favor of extreme taxonomic conservatism and to correct all the misidentified Lichen observations, I'm just swapping Lichen into Fungi.
Los desacuerdos no deseados ocurren cuando un padre (B) es
disminuido al mover un hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico,
resultando en que los IDs existentes del padre sean interpretados
como desacuerdos con los IDs existentes del hijo movido.
Identification
ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no deseado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del cambio de taxon
Si disminuir a un padre resulta en más de 10 desacuerdos no deseados, debes dividir al padre después de cambiar al hijo para reemplazar las identificaciones existentes de
el padre (B) con identificaciones que no están en desacuerdo.
I agree, the genus Lichen thing is very confusing to non Lichen experts