Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, S. M. Billerman, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2021. The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2021. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (Enlace)
I've got a question about this swap, and the related one for the other subspecies in this newly circumscribed species (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235). Many, if not most observations for both of these taxa (lilianae and auropectoralis) are initially identified as Sturnella magna. Would it be worth atlasing and changing those identifications as well? The vast majority can be assigned based on locality, as there is basically no distributional overlap between the species.
Los desacuerdos no deseados ocurren cuando un padre (B) es
disminuido al mover un hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico,
resultando en que los IDs existentes del padre sean interpretados
como desacuerdos con los IDs existentes del hijo movido.
Identification
ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no deseado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del cambio de taxon
Si disminuir a un padre resulta en más de 10 desacuerdos no deseados, debes dividir al padre después de cambiar al hijo para reemplazar las identificaciones existentes de
el padre (B) con identificaciones que no están en desacuerdo.
I've got a question about this swap, and the related one for the other subspecies in this newly circumscribed species (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235). Many, if not most observations for both of these taxa (lilianae and auropectoralis) are initially identified as Sturnella magna. Would it be worth atlasing and changing those identifications as well? The vast majority can be assigned based on locality, as there is basically no distributional overlap between the species.