Taxonomic Swap 123569 (Guardado el 28/02/2023)

Clements Checklist v2021 (Referencia)
| Resuelto por loarie en martes, 28 de febrero de 2023
reemplazar con


"Committed on 2023-02-28"

Looks like the swap is incomplete.

Anotado por victorengel hace 12 meses

Can you explain why this needed to happen?

Anotado por stunsal hace 12 meses

If you follow the links to the genera involved some of them have details. Genetic studies a few years ago show the new relationships. For example,

Anotado por victorengel hace 12 meses

Can Phalacrocorax also be split then? Currently there are many disagreements because of this swap. And indeed it looks like they have not all updated yet

Anotado por matthew_connors hace 12 meses

Interesting! Thank you for this!

Anotado por stunsal hace 12 meses
Anotado por victorengel hace 12 meses

I've just committed the Phalacrocorax split, so old genus-level IDs should be updated over the next couple days or so.

Anotado por maxkirsch hace 12 meses

@loarie similar (I think?) to what we saw on the recent Ruby-crowned Kinglet split, there are about 370 observations where all of the IDs have been updated but the taxon ID is still Phalacrocorax auritus 4265 and there is no community taxon: (these are not cases where the user is rejecting community taxon—there just isn't one).

Adding a new ID fixes them (e.g., Adding an annotation does not change anything (here I added an annotation of Evidence > Organism as a test: Adding a DQA somehow updates the taxon ID but does not update the community taxon, still leaving the observation in need of an additional confirming ID (here I added a "Organism is wild" vote:

In all I suppose 370 out of 90K+ ain't bad but FYI!

Edit: Hmm, looks like this is also pointed out here:

Anotado por djringer hace 12 meses

Añade un comentario

Entra o Regístrate para añadir comentarios