Blijkbaar post compleet gemist
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/options-for-the-best-way-to-handle-non-established-obs-e-g-escaped-released-pets/16684
Our opinion is that by default the species tab on explore should represent this ‘field guide’ scope of a place
If they are that dominant, aren’t they very likely to be encountered and should be included when using explore as an informal ‘field guide’?
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/options-for-the-best-way-to-handle-non-established-obs-e-g-escaped-released-pets/16684
If they are that dominant, aren’t they very likely to be encountered and should be included when using explore as an informal ‘field guide’?
no - they represent a tiny tiny subset of the observations so they don’t have a noticeable impact on the observations tab on the explore page - but because the diversity is more or less unbounded (in theory any animal species can be in captivity and can briefly escape/be dumped and be observed) they have a very noticeable impact on species tab of the explore page. For example in my CA reptiles example escaped/released pets represent about 0.02% of observations but about 20% of species
1 Like
arboretum_amy
September 25, 2020, 8:08pm
#15
loarie:
This would mean that captive/cultivated observations would be in Needs ID and Research. But we would add an additional set of search filters to Explore that default to excluding Casual, Captive/Cultivated, and Non-established observations by default.
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/options-for-the-best-way-to-handle-non-established-obs-e-g-escaped-released-pets/16684
- Gordon en Betty Moore Foundation
- Microsoft (Azure credits toward servers)
- Amazon (credits toward image storage)
- Google Maps (API access credits)
- Andere inkomsten
- 485 monthly donations
- Verkoop Merchandise
Publicado el
23 de noviembre de 2020 a las 01:04 AM
por
ahospers
Comentarios
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/options-for-the-best-way-to-handle-non-established-obs-e-g-escaped-released-pets/16684
Añade un comentario