it works! hmm not!

I tried my first download of location data with obscured location removed (one test taxon) and it worked as expected. Thanks so much for all of your help!

Hmm well I thought it was working but I used a taxon that had both obscured and normal locations and got back only the normal ones, so apparently there is a system bug. Thanks user efmer for pointing this out.

  • James

(note - only the admin can get the unobscured locations)

Publicado el 29 de enero de 2023 a las 04:51 PM por jhorthos jhorthos

Comentarios

Unless you have an old style project there is still a bug in the system the doesn't show plants that are obscured by the system.

Anotado por efmer hace más de un año

Huh, really? I might have misinterpreted the information but I got data for one that looked fine. Will look closer, thanks for the heads up.

James

Anotado por jhorthos hace más de un año

I think it works if the user obscures the location.
Had to make an old style project just to export our own observations.

Right now I have 5 exports that go into one database.
Combining two old style project with one new collection project.

Making maps that combine vouchers, calflora and inat.

https://borregowildflowers.org/inat/normal_access/index.php?genus=mohavea%20confertiflora

Anotado por efmer hace más de un año

Ah that would fit - the one I tested is automatically obscured due to threatened status.

Anotado por jhorthos hace más de un año

Añade un comentario

Entra o Regístrate para añadir comentarios